B&P INSIGHTS
October 2026
Picture 1
BHARUCHA & PARTNERS
Advocates & Solicitors
 
Cover image
NEWSLETTER (VOLUME I)
OCTOBER 2026
 
B&P Insights
We are pleased to present the 1st edition of B&P Insights.
India continues to see significant legal and regulatory developments affecting businesses, investors and financial institutions. This edition highlights recent developments in corporate transactions, competition, insurance, capital markets and dispute resolution, focusing on changes with the greatest practical impact on those operating in, investing in or dealing with India.1
 
IN THIS EDITION
 
01
Easing of FDI Restrictions on Investments from Bordering Countries
Press Note 2 (2026) shifts the approval test from residence to citizenship.
P. 2
02
India’s Merger Control Regime
Revised CCI filing thresholds, deal-value test and exemptions.
P. 2
03
Fast Track Mergers
Simplified merger route extended to more companies and demergers.
P. 2
04
Liberalisation in the Insurance Sector
100% foreign investment in insurers and increased penalties.
P. 2
05
Revised Startup Framework and New Deep Tech Category
New deep-tech category, turnover limits and recognition periods.
P. 3
06
AI and Copyright In India
Delhi High Court considers use of ANI’s works to train LLMs.
P. 3
07
Use of Trademarks in Keyword Advertising
Commercial use of trademarks as advertising keywords may confer an unfair advantage.
P. 3
08
Developments on Data Protection in India
Updates on India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
P. 3
09
Supreme Court Lays Down Framework for Attributing Mens Rea to Corporations
Supreme Court’s 3 stage test for attributing criminal intent to a company.
P. 4
10
Liquidated Damages and Contractual Risk Allocation
Commercial rationale should support a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
P. 4
11
SEBI extends flexibility to revise fresh issue size in IPO
Up to 50% variation in fresh issue size without SEBI consent.
P. 4
12
SEBI introduces common advertisement code for regulated entities
New rules on influencers, celebrity promotion and disclosures.
P. 5
13
SEBI proposes enhanced monitoring of issue proceeds
Monitoring agencies for all issues and new exchange penalties.
P. 5
 
About the Firm and contacts
Our offices, partners and contact details.
P. 5
 
1 For amounts where USD approximates have been set out, we have used the conversation rate prevailing on 21 October 2026.
 
01
GENERAL CORPORATE | M&A | PE
Easing of FDI Restrictions on Investments from Bordering Countries
 
 
On 15 March 2026 by way of Press Note 2 (2026 Series), he approval regime for investments linked to countries sharing a land border with India was revised. Approval previously applied where the investor or any beneficial owner was based in such a country.
The revised test focuses on citizenship rather than residence. For entities, approval is required only where beneficial owners collectively hold at least 10% or exercise control or significant influence over the investor or Indian target. Global PE and VC funds may, therefore, invest without approval where relevant limited partners remain below 10% and have no special rights. Other investments must be reported in a form yet to be prescribed.
 
02
GENERAL CORPORATE | M&A | PE
India’s Merger Control Regime
 
From 10 September 2024, India revised its merger control regime. A Competition Commission of India filing may be required if enterprise level thresholds are met (Indian assets of INR 25 billion (~USD 263.60 million) or turnover of INR 75 billion (~USD 790.81 million)) or group level thresholds are met (Indian assets of INR 100 billion (~USD 1.05 billion) or turnover of INR 300 billion (~USD 3.16 billion)), with corresponding worldwide thresholds requiring an India nexus. A separate deal value threshold applies where consideration exceeds INR 20 billion (~USD 210.88 million) and the target has substantial business operations in India.
A de minimis exemption may apply where the target’s Indian assets are below INR 4.5 billion (~USD 47.45 million) or its Indian turnover is below INR 1.2 billion (~USD 12.65 million), unless the deal value threshold is met. Acquisitions below 10% may be exempt if they confer no control, board or observer rights, or access to commercially sensitive information. Acquisitions of 10% to 25% must also involve no business overlap. Transactions without overlap may qualify for the accelerated green channel process.
03
GENERAL CORPORATE | M&A | PE
Fast Track Mergers
 
India has expanded its simplified merger process to combinations involving start-ups, small companies, holding companies and their wholly owned subsidiaries, certain unlisted group companies, and a foreign parent merging with its wholly owned Indian subsidiary, subject to foreign exchange approval. 2 or more unlisted companies may also qualify if specified debt, deposit, default and auditor certification conditions are met.
Since 4 September 2025, the process also covers qualifying divisions and business transfers. Notices inviting objections must be sent to relevant sectoral regulators and, for listed companies, the relevant stock exchange.
 
04
GENERAL CORPORATE | M&A | PE
Liberalisation in the Insurance Sector
 
 
On 20 December 2025, India amended the Insurance Act, 1938, the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956 and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 1999. The amendments permit 100% foreign investment in Indian insurers, subject to prescribed conditions, and broaden key statutory definitions, including health insurance and insurance intermediaries.
Insurer investments are now governed by regulations. Directors and officers face tighter cross-board restrictions, while intermediary registrations remain valid unless suspended or cancelled, subject to an annual fee. The maximum penalty has increased from INR 0.01 billion (~USD 105,441) to INR 0.1 billion (~USD 1.05 million), assessed by the breach, gains, policyholder loss and mitigation.
 
05
GENERAL CORPORATE | M&A | PE
Revised Startup Framework and New Deep Tech Category
 
 
Recognised Indian start-ups may qualify for tax, procurement and accelerated patent-processing benefits. A 4 February 2026 notification created a deep technology category for businesses based on new scientific or engineering knowledge, intensive research and development, novel technology, long development periods and significant capital needs.
Eligible entities now include co-operatives. Annual turnover limits are INR 2 billion (~USD 21.09 million) for start-ups and INR 3 billion (~USD 31.63 million) for deep technology start-ups. Recognition lasts up to 10 years, or 20 years for deep technology start-ups. During the recognition, non-core investments in land and buildings, loans, advances, securities, high-value non-operational transport vehicles and jewellery are generally prohibited.
06
TMT | MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
AI and Copyright in India
 
 
In ANI Media v. OpenAI, the Delhi High Court provisionally held that using ANI’s works to train large language models qualified as fair dealing for research under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The proceedings remain pending, and it remains unclear when copyrighted material, including non-news content, may be used for AI training without authorisation.
In separate proceedings on AI-assisted artwork, the Copyright Office declined to recognise an AI system as an author or co-author, relying on the statutory definition of the author of a computer-generated work as the person who causes its creation. Patent applications naming an AI inventor were also rejected.
A December 2025 Government working paper proposes statutory licensing for copyrighted works used in AI training, with collective remuneration for rights holders. The proposal remains under consideration.
 
 
07
TMT | MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Use of Trademarks in Keyword Advertising
 
In Hindware v. Grohe India, the Delhi High Court held that Google’s commercial use of the coined, distinctive HINDWARE mark as an advertising keyword took unfair advantage of the brand. The Court rejected intermediary protection because Google actively suggested, auctioned and monetised trademark keywords. It permanently restrained the infringing use and awarded nominal damages plus actual litigation costs. Google’s appeal is pending; interim protection was declined.
The decision does not prohibit all competitor-keyword advertising. Earlier decisions distinguish keyword use from infringement, which depends on confusion, unfair advantage and other factors. The coined mark, finding of unfair advantage and Google’s conduct remain central to the appeal.
 
08
TMT | MEDIA & ENTERTAINMENT | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Developments on Data Protection in India
 
India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 and related rules are being implemented in phases. Institutional provisions took effect on 13 November 2025. Consent Manager registration provisions are scheduled for 13 November 2026. Core obligations on notice, consent, security, breach notification and individual rights take effect on 13 May 2027. The framework also applies outside India where processing relates to offering goods or services to individuals in India. Government may restrict cross-border transfers through a negative list.
Sector-specific requirements continue alongside the new framework, including the Reserve Bank of India’s lending and payment system requirements, the securities regulator’s cybersecurity framework and the insurance regulator’s information-security guidelines. Businesses should account for these parallel requirements before the principal compliance deadline.
The Information Technology (Reasonable Security Practices and Procedures and Sensitive Personal Data or Information) Rules, 2011 also remain applicable during the transition, until expressly repealed when the new act commences.
 
09
DISPUTES
Supreme Court Lays Down Framework for Attributing Mens Rea to Corporations
 
In Sanofi India v. Central Bureau of Investigation, the Supreme Court set out a framework for attributing criminal intent to a company. The case concerned alleged favouritism in drug procurement. No employee or officer had been arraigned, and the company argued that prosecution could not proceed without identifying and arraigning its directing mind. Earlier decisions had established that companies may be liable for offences requiring criminal intent.
The Court adopted a sequential 3 stage inquiry: whether the company’s constitutional documents or company law authorised the act; whether authority was expressly or impliedly delegated with genuine discretion and independence; and whether the statute’s purpose required a special rule of attribution.
The framework principally applies to offences requiring criminal intent and was framed with individuals in mind. The requisite intent must exist fully in at least 1 individual, although that person need not be identified or arraigned in a challenge seeking to end the proceedings.
The inquiry does not apply where legislation identifies the relevant persons, creates vicarious liability or imposes strict liability. The Court confined earlier authorities to statutes making vicarious liability subject to a condition precedent, emphasised the framework’s limited scope and left broader corporate liability to the legislature.
 
10
DISPUTES
Liquidated Damages and Contractual Risk Allocation
 
Calling liquidated damages a genuine pre-estimate of loss is not necessarily conclusive under Indian law. Courts and tribunals may examine whether the clause provides compensation rather than a windfall. In BPL Limited v. Morgan Securities, the Supreme Court recognised that a negotiated consequence of breach may protect a legitimate commercial interest without precisely estimating eventual loss.
In practice, businesses may consider recording the commercial rationale for stipulated sums in the agreement rather than establish it in later proceedings.
 
11
EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS
SEBI extends flexibility to revise fresh issue size in IPO
 
Previously, an issuer could vary the fresh issue size disclosed in the draft offer document by up to 20%, and an offer for sale by up to 50%, without re-filing.
Following market uncertainty in early 2026, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) permitted, on a case by case basis, fresh issue variations of up to 50% for offerings opening before 30 September 2026. The main objects could not change, and the revision had to be disclosed by addendum.
SEBI has removed its prior consent requirement. Lead managers must ensure that revisions are adequately justified. The framework applies to offerings opening by 31 March 2027.
 
12
EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS
SEBI introduces common advertisement code for regulated entities
 
SEBI has notified a common advertising code for regulated entities. Advertisement broadly includes endorsements by social media influencers and computer-generated virtual influencers. Celebrity promotion is allowed only at the brand or entity level, subject to approval by SEBI or the relevant supervisory body; promotion of specific products or services remains prohibited. Endorsement costs cannot be passed to clients or mutual fund schemes.
Advertisements must identify the regulated entity and include prescribed disclosures. They cannot be false, misleading or ambiguous, or use testimonials, disparagement, cross-category comparisons, promotional incentives, unwarranted claims, dark patterns, ratings or rankings. Specified non-promotional educational and informational communications are excluded. Promotional character depends on tone, prominence and call to action.
13
EQUITY CAPITAL MARKETS
SEBI proposes enhanced monitoring of issue proceeds
 
In an October 2026 consultation paper, SEBI proposed stronger monitoring and disclosure of issue proceeds, including:
a.Requiring a monitoring agency for all public offerings, rights issues, preferential issues and qualified institutions placements, regardless of issue size;
b.Extending monitoring to specified pre-offering proceeds, deposits with scheduled commercial banks, issue expenses and downstream use by recipient entities; and
c.Allowing stock exchanges to impose a penalty of INR 50,000/- (~USD 527) where an issuer fails to provide information. The monitoring agency could report directly to the stock exchange using the best available information and flag non-cooperation. Continued non-compliance or non-payment could, after notice, lead to freezing promoters’ securities accounts.
 
OFFICES
 
Mumbai
13th Floor, Free Press House
Free Press Journal Marg
Nariman Point
Mumbai 400 021
 
New Delhi
2nd Floor Legacy 42 Okhla Industrial Estate III
New Delhi 110 019
India
 
Bengaluru
Beginest No. 37
Castle Street, Ashok Nagar
Bengaluru 560 025
India
T +91 22 6132 3900
F +91 22 6633 3900
 
T +91 11 4593 9300
F +91 22 6633 3900
 
T +91 80 4614 2724
F +91 22 6633 3900
 
bharucha.in | LinkedIn | sr.partner@bharucha.in | ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certified
 
 
We are qualified to practice law only in India, and this Newsletter is restricted to matters of Indian law in force on the date of this Newsletter. This Newsletter sets out matters of law and principles of general application be applied in context of and subject to facts. We have not, nor should we be construed to have, researched, examined or expressed an opinion on issues arising under the laws of any jurisdiction other than India.
 
© 2026 Bharucha & Partners. All rights reserved. Except as permitted by applicable law, no part of this Newsletter may be copied, reproduced, republished, distributed, transmitted, or otherwise used, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of Bharucha & Partners.
bharucha.in | Mumbai · New Delhi · Bengaluru